Piracy: Not Gone, Just Metastasizing
Those of you with long memories (i.e. capable of reaching back to 2009 - that's a long time in the e-world) may recall that I made a fuss on Sky News about the looming threat of book piracy. This was in response to a panellist on Litopia After Dark who drew our attention to the easy availability of many top-ten titles on the fledgling Scribd.
Scribd have cleaned up their act since then. The general perception in publishing seems to be that piracy isn't currently a major problem - and if it ever becomes so, then we can just carry on playing "Whack-a-Mole" with DMCA takedown notices. Someone posts an illegal file, and we just whack 'em with a takedown notice. Nice and simple.
And wrong.
Check out what's happening to the movie industry at the moment, and you'll get a taste of what's in store for us any day now.
Here's the headline: "Piracy 1.0" has evolved into "Piracy 2.0". The hydra has been decapitated. Now the real fun begins.
Piracy used to be a fairly grubby business for the end-user. You had to visit obviously-dodgy websites, or face installing some sort of Torrent client. Either way, you knew you were doing something wrong (and yes, I know there are legitimate uses for Torrents - but I'm not talking about them here).
With the recent growth of content aggregators/site scrapers such as Navi-X, a crucial separation has occurred between pirate and plunder. The end user no longer has to connect to a dodgy website or install nefarious software. Granted that someone, somewhere, must originally and illegally upload the pirated file. But here's the difference - today's consumer of pirated material consumes it through an opaque veil of deniability. Navi-X, for example, has a gorgeous, glossy interface that looks anything but illicit. It offers a ton of legit audio and video programming to consume at the click of a mouse. Some of these playlists are official RSS feeds from around the web; some are user-generated playlists that contain pirated material. Who's to know which is which? The end-user certainly doesn't know - and just as certainly doesn't want to know. As far as they're concerned, it's all just part of the vast media soup that is the internet. Click and consume.
That's the evil genius of programs such as Navi-X. They've taken the guilt out of piracy.
Will the e-book business be crucified by the impact of next-gen content aggregators - or will we, miraculously, be saved from looting - like Waterstones was in Clapham Junction?
I think we have to assume that we will indeed be affected. The only conceivable reason for thinking that this won't affect us is that we have ceased to be economically significant - surely an even worse fate.
We need to get ready for Piracy 2.0 now.
Today's tools won't work.
Let's start discussing what will.
-----
Pic by dr XeNo
Blogs
Platinum Sponsors
Gold Sponsors
Podcast
Recent blog posts
- In search of Project Z
- OMG£££ - iPad apps and learning from games, pt 1
- Knowing Your Audience is Key
- When e-books were growing
- Joining up the reading universe
- How digital stalking can get you published
- Playing publishing roulette with Stephen Leather
- Has Pottermore cast the Riddikulus spell on Amazon?
- The digital-only model is cool for cats - and even Shakespeare
- Publishers keep passing the open windows
Recent comments
- Self vs Indie
1 week 5 days ago - digital downloads
1 week 6 days ago - Customer support
2 weeks 2 days ago - huh
2 weeks 4 days ago - SoA
2 weeks 5 days ago - Futurebook also had a review of an ebook lender startup
2 weeks 5 days ago - I'm with you on this.
2 weeks 5 days ago - Excellent startup
2 weeks 6 days ago - AT LAST...
3 weeks 5 days ago - Books aren't fungible, bookselling is
3 weeks 6 days ago

















Comments
Changing Nature of Infringement
Peter - I fully agree that we need new tools and approaches to combat developments in online copyright infringement. The Publishers Association Copyright Infringement Portal does a great job in disrupting piracy sites and making the lives of would-be users of these sites less enjoyable. But of course, like any measure, it is not enough. That is why together with the BPI, Premier League and film studios, the PA is in regular dialogue with internet service providers and search engines - mediated by DCMS Ministers - with the aim of finding new approaches. Blocking infringing sites and deranking infringing sites in search results would go a long way in hampering infringement yet further. Ultimately, the best response to illegal comes not with enforcement measures (vital though they are) but through great legal services and education campaigns. At The PA we're just completing some research into the levels of online infringement and the motivations of those who engage in it. We're hoping to publish it next month. I hope it will make for interesting reading, and will help all of us in the industry looking to tackle this serious issue with some critical insights.
Research
Hi Richard, thanks for commenting here.
If you'd like to publish your research here you'd be very welcome. Or perhaps you'd like to write a piece on how the PA is helping the industry to combat this issue?
You might be interested to know that, of the UK publishers who have resonded to our FutureBook survey, less than half (44.5%) said they had a strategy in place for dealing with piracy.
Still a way to go, it seems.
Look forward to hearing from you.
Post new comment