It’s an overused phrase, but one that we have used to avoid the growing pains that the new eBook world is creating for royalties. We think we’ve cracked the payment issue on eBook royalties for our authors in a way that is fair to the authors, but doesn’t shackle our growth.
eBook sales have hit 33% of our sales last month but in the Sherlock Holmes genre, in which we are ‘one of the leading publishers in the world’ – whatever leading means – it is nudging 50% in some countries. This presented us with a dilemma a while back as the complexity started.
With ebooks we have typically significantly lower RRPs, and a desire/market requirement/moral obligation (select your preferred description) to pay our authors more money on the ebooks as we make more margin. Yes all you publishing bleating hearts with your ‘but ebooks costs are much more than they appear’ can argue the toss about that but come on lads and lasses, in the medium to long term we’re much better off.
Layer on the 6 currencies we are already operating in (eek) which is growing and giving us palpitations every time the £ gets a hammering from the Euro and we have a potential scale limiting mess. Well, the good news is we’ve fixed it – I think.
We now pay a gross RRP % royalty based on the UK GBP RRP of the paperback version – irrespective of the format and channel and have changed our contracts to reflect that too. In practice what does that mean?
1) Authors are getting % gross on the paperback, unchanged, but the eBook % equivalent is between 25-35% depending on the channel and is very easily explained to them.
2) Reporting for royalties is a doddle – just add up the total amount sold in the formats (we are in 7 so far at last count) and the calculation is simple.
So one big headache removed plus the added benefit that it reinforces the “if you don’t have a blog, don’t bother sending us your manuscript” (engage with social media please) position with the authors. A ‘Kindled Up’ reader is much more likely to be highly influenced by social media so if the author clocks they are earning 35% from Kindle sales they may well get their blogging head on.
Recent blog posts
- Douglas Preston: On Amazon, Hachette, and Indie Authors
- Altbookstores for different readers
- Publishers must make a decision over subscription services
- #FutureChat recap: A busy workout in the subscription debate
- #FutureChat: Can subscriptions pay off for all kinds of books?
- BISG study: A buffet of digital book subscriptions
- The debutant's dilemma
- BitLit announces HarperCollins ebook bundling pilot programme
- #FutureChat recap: How can we ease the summer's debate?
- 10 questions about subscriptions with Andrew Savikas from Safari
- "We're Not Taking Sides"
41 min 57 sec ago
- For Douglas Preston
6 hours 21 min ago
- An old post from the other
22 hours 52 min ago
- KU not for ME
6 days 48 min ago
- Genre and the Howey AuthorEarnings reports
2 weeks 6 days ago
- A couple of quick notes
3 weeks 18 hours ago
- Incomes for self-pubs vs. trad pubs aren't equal
3 weeks 21 hours ago
3 weeks 2 days ago
- I said
3 weeks 2 days ago
- A little odd?
3 weeks 3 days ago
Tweets from @thefuturebook
TheFutureBook RT @Porter_Anderson: The #altbookstore group has its 2nd day, the dropcam here: t.co/cNYdoizF0w to start at 10aET t.co/IF9k1h…
TheFutureBook "Little bit betrayed": Douglas Preston on #Authors Unlimited & #AmazonHachette: t.co/Bh7LSN3xZm @TheBookseller #FutureChat Friday
TheFutureBook "Unfair of @Amazon to target #authors as...leverage." Douglas Preston ↬ @SarahMedway t.co/hIMefmMSxV @TheBookseller #FutureChat