Amazon’s AutoRip service is simple. You buy a CD, you automatically get a digital file of the same content. (A similar logic applies in DVD purchases of a lot of films these days - you get a free download as well as a hardcopy.)
For the consumer, it’s an obvious plus. For Amazon, the upside is a little bit more complex - it’s not just a sale, it’s about getting customers tied into Amazon’s cloud service. In case it’s not obvious, pretty much everything they do is about making themselves the goto life provider.
But the important point for publishing is that this is the direction of things. This is what Amazon is getting customers used to. This is what the online retailer which defines the term thinks is the next logical step for media. So put aside, please, the issue of whether print is different (yes, it takes longer to ‘rip’ a book; no, that does not make a huge difference in an environment where DRM-stripped files can be had for the asking) or whether, indeed, you believe that this is ‘not something people want’. I haven’t seen any research which suggests it isn’t, so as far as I know it’s your anecdote against mine, but that’s now beside the point: Amazon is creating a situation where content comes in hardcopy and download as normal. Books may lag behind, or they may not, but if AutoRip flourishes - and there’s really no reason why it wouldn’t - that perception of how things should work will bleed through into our industry.
So now that bundling is (probably) inevitable, should the industry consider how to do it in such a way that customers can be offered the opportunity to buy the audiobook and/or the sequel at the same time? Well, yeah. This is a classic example of a situation where the general direction is pretty clear but the specifics - the implementation, the side-benefits (for the trade) and structural advantages, ultimately all the things which add up to control - are still up for grabs. With several publishers starting to sell direct to consumer last year, this is also a moment to consider ways in which to draw readers to those sites - a happy confluence of interest. It’s in retailers’ interests to stop that happening, of course - to keep readers in their ecosystem. If publishing wants control of its relationship with readers and of access to market, then this is a pinch-point - one of the few places left where it’s possible to claw some market share away from its most scary friends at Amazon, Apple, Google et al.
As an author, I find that I’m less and less concerned about what happens in this context. It frustrates me that services my readers routinely ask me for are mysteriously difficult to provide (all right, not mysteriously; I know why they’re difficult, but I also know that in other industries those barriers would fall because the consumer wants them to) but I don’t greatly fear for my profession. I do begin to fear for conventional publishing, however, as the boom in digital reading levels out somewhat and the niches and positions start to fill up with small and large entities with sharp elbows and a desire to economise. Yes, it's great news that people are reading more than everyone thought (and that was invisible to us because until recently we didn't have the data - emphasising the importance of being able to gather that information, something the industry is presently unable to do through online retailers) but it's not enough to make a robust trade. It brings its own danger - of a structural increase in digital reading propping up middling practice, a natural and perhaps impermanent increase in digital sales papering over the cracks in the machinery.
As ever, 2013 begins with the certainty that the future is the product of what we do now, not a fixed course we must navigate. It’s not about whether you use sails, steam, or the combustion engine to travel on the river. It’s about whether you use a dredger to build a canal or just hope like Hell the other guy builds one deep enough for your keel.
Recent blog posts
- #FutureChat: How can we pay authors what they deserve?
- Author Emma Chapman on the road: Indie Book Crawl
- UK author income survey: Another publishing bombshell
- The Sound of One Hand Clapping?
- Nadine Dorries tops May's e-book ranking
- #FutureChat recap: Authors in the hot zone
- #FutureChat: Authors in the hot zone
- The NYPL Amazon panel: Views and reviews
- Reading into the future
- Is this another anti-Amazon Smokescreen from Publishing’s Big Boys?
- Genre and the Howey AuthorEarnings reports
1 day 13 hours ago
- A couple of quick notes
2 days 12 hours ago
- Incomes for self-pubs vs. trad pubs aren't equal
2 days 14 hours ago
3 days 22 hours ago
- I said
3 days 23 hours ago
- A little odd?
4 days 23 hours ago
6 days 17 hours ago
6 days 22 hours ago
- Thanks for the note
6 days 22 hours ago
- Readers ARE being asked to boycott Amazon
6 days 22 hours ago
Tweets from @thefuturebook
TheFutureBook In @JaneFriedman's "Smart Set," our coverage of @ALCS_UK's author-income study: t.co/GBFgg4YSvG | #FutureChat Friday 4pBST
TheFutureBook "That #authors are paid too little...is indisputable." @PhilipDSJones in today's @TheBookseller | 4pBST today: #FutureChat on the topic
TheFutureBook @cjflood_author & @neeshed win @BranfordBoase for "Infinite Sky" (@SimonSchuster) @CharlotteLEyre t.co/4pL0WTQWMR @TheBookseller