Amazon’s AutoRip service is simple. You buy a CD, you automatically get a digital file of the same content. (A similar logic applies in DVD purchases of a lot of films these days - you get a free download as well as a hardcopy.)
For the consumer, it’s an obvious plus. For Amazon, the upside is a little bit more complex - it’s not just a sale, it’s about getting customers tied into Amazon’s cloud service. In case it’s not obvious, pretty much everything they do is about making themselves the goto life provider.
But the important point for publishing is that this is the direction of things. This is what Amazon is getting customers used to. This is what the online retailer which defines the term thinks is the next logical step for media. So put aside, please, the issue of whether print is different (yes, it takes longer to ‘rip’ a book; no, that does not make a huge difference in an environment where DRM-stripped files can be had for the asking) or whether, indeed, you believe that this is ‘not something people want’. I haven’t seen any research which suggests it isn’t, so as far as I know it’s your anecdote against mine, but that’s now beside the point: Amazon is creating a situation where content comes in hardcopy and download as normal. Books may lag behind, or they may not, but if AutoRip flourishes - and there’s really no reason why it wouldn’t - that perception of how things should work will bleed through into our industry.
So now that bundling is (probably) inevitable, should the industry consider how to do it in such a way that customers can be offered the opportunity to buy the audiobook and/or the sequel at the same time? Well, yeah. This is a classic example of a situation where the general direction is pretty clear but the specifics - the implementation, the side-benefits (for the trade) and structural advantages, ultimately all the things which add up to control - are still up for grabs. With several publishers starting to sell direct to consumer last year, this is also a moment to consider ways in which to draw readers to those sites - a happy confluence of interest. It’s in retailers’ interests to stop that happening, of course - to keep readers in their ecosystem. If publishing wants control of its relationship with readers and of access to market, then this is a pinch-point - one of the few places left where it’s possible to claw some market share away from its most scary friends at Amazon, Apple, Google et al.
As an author, I find that I’m less and less concerned about what happens in this context. It frustrates me that services my readers routinely ask me for are mysteriously difficult to provide (all right, not mysteriously; I know why they’re difficult, but I also know that in other industries those barriers would fall because the consumer wants them to) but I don’t greatly fear for my profession. I do begin to fear for conventional publishing, however, as the boom in digital reading levels out somewhat and the niches and positions start to fill up with small and large entities with sharp elbows and a desire to economise. Yes, it's great news that people are reading more than everyone thought (and that was invisible to us because until recently we didn't have the data - emphasising the importance of being able to gather that information, something the industry is presently unable to do through online retailers) but it's not enough to make a robust trade. It brings its own danger - of a structural increase in digital reading propping up middling practice, a natural and perhaps impermanent increase in digital sales papering over the cracks in the machinery.
As ever, 2013 begins with the certainty that the future is the product of what we do now, not a fixed course we must navigate. It’s not about whether you use sails, steam, or the combustion engine to travel on the river. It’s about whether you use a dredger to build a canal or just hope like Hell the other guy builds one deep enough for your keel.
Recent blog posts
- China e-book market hungry for growth
- Paperback pioneers
- Achieving all the sales in the world | @Tom_Chalmers
- Old possum's piece of publishing wisdom
- Publishing's hits and misses
- Self-publishing changed my life, but my publisher grew my sales
- Why Huge Publishing Advances can be Huge Steps Backwards
- Adaptive, Attractive, Interactive: A New Chapter for Digital Textbooks
- What books want
- Publishing has entered a new and different era
- Dead books walking
1 week 6 days ago
- Why Segregate?
4 weeks 4 days ago
- Big idea: build a new ecosystem - An alternative idea
6 weeks 3 days ago
- finding editors
7 weeks 5 days ago
- Predatory Publishers
12 weeks 6 days ago
- Hybird Authors
15 weeks 6 days ago
16 weeks 6 days ago
- Still not a plateau
16 weeks 6 days ago
- Fascinating article
18 weeks 3 days ago
- What if not everything stays the same?
18 weeks 5 days ago
Tweets from @thefuturebook
TheFutureBook RT @Porter_Anderson: .@PeterJamesUK, our #PorterMeets guest at 4pGMT for @TheBookseller, saw "Dead Letter Drop" republished in January htt…
TheFutureBook RT @LashesC: Cryptic email sent to publishers from Blackwell's...teaser campaign? t.co/6f2Gcxsv5d
TheFutureBook "If McCrum's view of 90s publishing was partial, his awareness of publishing now seems wilfully blind" @philipdsjones t.co/gn2VkUzqYM