Has Amazon made Waterstones digitally relevant?

Last night at the IPG Digital Quarterly Meeting the guest speaker was James Daunt, he was there to discuss Waterstone's 'deal with the devil' and their plans for digital book selling, this is my view of what happened.

The was only one place to start, why get in bed with your biggest competitor? Clearly from a number of Daunt's comments throughout the hour in an ideal world this is not a relationship he is 100% happy about, mainly because in his own words 'in an ideal world Amazon would have gone bust.' But the reason they needed a deal was, and he blames his predecessors for this, they hadn't developed their own eReader at the start of the digital boom, instead they stocked a mish-mash of low-quality hardware (Sony excepted of course) that he got rid of as soon as he took over.

To jump into the eReader market now would take them 10's of millions just to catch-up and they don't have the time or resources to do that, so they are waiting for the type of hardware readers use to become irrelevant so they can concentrate on being a content seller. So instead, in his own words, they will be selling the very best reading devices on the market because that's what their customers expect and with this deal they are 'making themselves relevant in the digital arena'. That said it seems the space dedicated to digital in store will be limited to no more than that of a grand piano.

For a company that prides itself on service to its customers one surprising comment from Daunt was that he didn't think their customers 'would give a monkeys' that Waterstones was selling Amazon products - personally I think that's a little cavalier. As we all know Waterstones has moved further into book related products, seemingly trying to emulate B&N, I can vouch for that as there is more Lego on sale in store than in your average Toys R Us, and he sees Kindle and Kindle Fire as welcome additions to that list.

While he wouldn't be drawn on the financials of the deals he said we would be able to tell if the deal was going well based on how long the partnership continued. He also said that as yet you can't tell how many of your Kindle sales are through Amazon and how many through Waterstones. An interesting aside is that the deal isn't exclusive on either end, Waterstones can continue to sell ePubs and Amazon are able to set up the same deal with other shops - maybe there is an opportunity here for the indies.

One of the areas he was excited by, as a growing digital retailer, was the idea of print and digital bundling, though he thought that should carry a small cost to the consumer. Looking forward to Christmas Daunt sees this as another season where digital will make significant growth, and with the wealth of good, cheap tablets and eReaders out now who isn't expecting to see some level of growth on the horizon.

So how does the deal work:  

  • If you buy your hardware in Waterstones they 'have an interest in that' and also in any books you buy on it wherever you may be
  • If you bring your hardware in store and link up to their wifi then anything you purchase in that store they 'have an interest in'

Whether you think this is a bold and creative move from a retailer unable to build its own platform or the desperate actions of a crumbling empire taking an economic bailout from its enemy we are certainly seeing a coalition none of us could have predicted.

Comments

Confused.com

NickAtkinson7's picture

It's very hard to imagine a scenario where, in the long-term, Waterstones drives any real benefit from this arrangement, bar bizarrely positioning themselves as the facilitator in transitioning their customers to a competitor and giving an extra nudge-along to the downfall of print. It is definitely not inconcievable that you'll soon be able to collect your Amazon order instore at Waterstones in the style of Amazon's new US urban-centre pick-up points venture. In fact, Waterstones may as well just slap a redirect on Waterstones.com to Amazon.co.uk and have done with it.

I'd love to know what others think, but my gut instinct is that the amount of people using their device instore, to purchase Kindle ebooks via Waterstones wifi will be very small and the financial kickback to Waterstones, even less. It doesn't fit normal ecommerce habits and how sickening would it be for WS staff to watch people in their stores shopping from Amazon and leaving without making a purchase? And again, the financial reward in the short-term, compared to the long-term commercial damage this could cause (if indeed Waterstones plan to continue trading as Waterstones) is pretty hard to align.

There seems to be so many flaws with this arrangement from Waterstones POV and none from Amazon's. In some ways it's a tremendous piece of negotiation on Amazon's part and it's hard not to admire it. It's the ultimate marketing play - get your competitors to market your brand for you.

There must be more to this arrangement than meets the eye.

Bit of a damp squib then and

Bit of a damp squib then and they still hand over all their customers effectively to Amazon.

 

Post new comment

You will need to register to comment on Futurebook.net. Register here This will take less than a minute.
By posting on this website you agree to the Bookseller Comments Policy. comments go live immediately, please be relevant, brief and definitely not abusive.
Enter your FutureBook username.
Enter the password that accompanies your username.
  • Web page addresses and e-mail addresses turn into links automatically.
  • Allowed HTML tags: <a> <em> <strong> <cite> <code> <ul> <ol> <li> <dl> <dt> <dd> <p> <b> <i> <strong> <br>
  • Lines and paragraphs break automatically.

More information about formatting options

Type the characters you see in this picture. (verify using audio)
Type the characters you see in the picture above; if you can't read them, submit the form and a new image will be generated. Not case sensitive.